Following two days of violent clashes, Egyptian opposition supporters have vowed to continue protesting. According to the country's Health Ministry, several hundred people were injured during confrontations with the army and groups of unidentified men in civilian clothes.
The protesters have continued demonstrating since Hosni Mubarak stepped down in February, about the slow pace of political and social change. Speculation is rife that the clashes were orchestrated by the military but the army continues to deny any such doing.
Some of the demonstrators have already returned to Tahrir Square in the centre of Cairo, despite being heavily injured. Most incurred injury when unidentified men in plain clothes attacked marches from the square to the defence ministry, where the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) is based.
The protesters continue to be defiant, and the clashes last week mark a new turning point in the confrontation between the opposition and SCAF, who continues to have trouble appealing to ordinary Egyptians.
Sources: BBC News, Reuters, Bloomberg
For more news and expert analysis about Egypt, please see Egypt Politics & Security.
Showing posts with label Egypt army. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Egypt army. Show all posts
Monday, 25 July 2011
Thursday, 17 March 2011
Divisions in the country have put the army in a quandary
When the army first announced that it was appointing a distinguished jurist Tariq Al Bishri to oversee a committee to supervise the proposed amendments to the constitution, the move was broadly welcomed. The committee recommended limiting the number of terms a president serves, allowing for opposition candidates to stand, ensuring judicial supervision of elections and restricting the imposition of emergency powers.
Another proposed change stipulates more stringent nationality criteria for presidential candidates, banning those with dual citizenship or a foreign parent or wife.
Egypt is used to having referenda — and traditionally, the full force of the state has been deployed to ensure that nothing less than a thumping majority in favour of the government is achieved.
This time is different. There is no regime to call the shots. The groundswell of opposition to the changes has been growing. Some jurists have objected on procedural grounds.
They say there was insufficient time and consultation over the changes.
Increasingly, opposition has been voiced by those calling for more radical changes to the constitution, not tinkering. The issue has polarised opinion even among the reformers.
There are those who feel that voting “Yes” would be the least bad option and help the army return to barracks more quickly.
The divisions put the army in a quandary. It had set a sixmonth timetable for handing over power to a new civilian authority. It now finds that the myriad of organisations within the protest movement which called for the immediate departure of President Mubarak are now calling for more time before elections are held and more time to draw up a new constitution.
What will happen if the people vote against the amendments? The army will, in effect, have to come up with a Plan B. They are being asked by the people — or at least those who led the protests — to stay out of their barracks a little longer to give the new political forces time to prepare.
For more news and expert analysis about Egypt, please see Egypt Politics & Security.
© 2011 Menas Associates
Another proposed change stipulates more stringent nationality criteria for presidential candidates, banning those with dual citizenship or a foreign parent or wife.
Egypt is used to having referenda — and traditionally, the full force of the state has been deployed to ensure that nothing less than a thumping majority in favour of the government is achieved.
This time is different. There is no regime to call the shots. The groundswell of opposition to the changes has been growing. Some jurists have objected on procedural grounds.
They say there was insufficient time and consultation over the changes.
Increasingly, opposition has been voiced by those calling for more radical changes to the constitution, not tinkering. The issue has polarised opinion even among the reformers.
There are those who feel that voting “Yes” would be the least bad option and help the army return to barracks more quickly.
The divisions put the army in a quandary. It had set a sixmonth timetable for handing over power to a new civilian authority. It now finds that the myriad of organisations within the protest movement which called for the immediate departure of President Mubarak are now calling for more time before elections are held and more time to draw up a new constitution.
What will happen if the people vote against the amendments? The army will, in effect, have to come up with a Plan B. They are being asked by the people — or at least those who led the protests — to stay out of their barracks a little longer to give the new political forces time to prepare.
For more news and expert analysis about Egypt, please see Egypt Politics & Security.
© 2011 Menas Associates
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

