President Abdelaziz Bouteflika's security
advisor, Kalel Rezzag Bara, speaking on local national radio on
10 November, warned that military intervention in Mali was currently a useless
step as it would only worsen the situation. He said that a peaceful settlement
of the Malian crisis was still possible and that “It's necessary to reach an
acceptable agreement to avoid the spill over of the Malian conflict into
neighbouring nations."
Bara also said that the international community should
distinguish between Tuareg rebels, the National Movement for the Liberation of
Azawad (MNLA), who carry political claims and terror groups belonging to
al-Qa'ida organisation and drug trafficking gangs. Interestingly, as part of
Algeria's attempt to muddy the waters Bara included the Islamist groups Ansar
al-Din alongside the MNLA when the former is in fact largely a creation of the
DRS. Its leader, Iyad ag Ghaly has been a close associated of
the DRS since the 1980s and is even spoken of in some quarters as “Algeria's man
in Mali”.
Ansar al-Din, created in December 2011, is playing the lead
role amongst the Islamists. The key question is whether Algeria still has
effective control over it and whether the international community will believe
its recent more conciliatory remarks. Kamel Bara is doing his bit in trying to
get the international community to see Ansar al-Din as more allied to the Tuareg
rebels than AQIM which has not been the case. Ansar al-Din's more conciliatory
moves are part of Algeria's desperate moves to achieve a peaceful settlement and
so prevent military intervention.
We should add that Ansar al-Din - along with AQIM and the DRS –
heads the list in the International Criminal Court's (ICC) preliminary
investigations into war crimes in northern Mali.
For more news and expert
analysis about Algeria, please see Algeria
Focus and Algeria
Politics & Security.
© 2012 Menas Associates
No comments:
Post a Comment